Skip to main content

Bing Versus Google

High Technology Product Reviews | Trends and News | Bing Versus Google
It seems as if Google is concerned, once again, about developing a social network which will enable it to compete with Microsoft's conjunction with Facebook.

This is going to be the comedy act of the year.
Numerous articles floating around seem to promote the idea that Google may be unable to compete with the likes of Bing once the great social network of Facebook opens the kimono to Microsoft. The argument states: because there is so much personal information about me on Facebook (I actually don't have a Facebook account), that when I search for something on Bing, a cloud of personal information can be analyzed to improve search results. However, nothing could be further from the truth.

First of all, it doesn't make any sense. If I am looking for a schedule of events in San Francisco, what does my Facebook data have to do with it? If I am trying to find the exact date Thomas Jefferson was born, then what does Facebook have to do with it?

This entire gambit is unfortunately about finding new ways to sucker advertisers into selling on the Bing search engine.

Here's is what is going to happen. You are going to search for the birthday of Thomas Jefferson, and the advertising delivery modeler, which would normally find some random advertisement for memorial information or Jeffersonian memorabilia or who knows what, will now look at your Facebook information, see that you went to Jefferson High School and assume you are obviously looking up something in regards to the school. If the engine is worth a powder, it will do the math and discover that you're class is having a their 40th annual high school reunion, and the ad server will hopefully display ads for party favors, event planning and other related items. Thus, target ads would be based on multiple factors.

Yes, under some circumstance, this might actually work. And, boy, I bet it works great when shown on a PowerPoint presentation or in a rigged demonstration, but in the real world, this idea will cough and sputter and probably produce some of the funniest results in the history of targeted advertising. Eventually, it will deteriorate to merely serving you ads based on things you said were your favs on Facebook.

It's only because Microsoft partnered with Facebook once before that it could manage seal this deal. Microsoft is an expert in demos, and I'm sure it can produce a wild and stunning presentation showing how well this social-centric search works. Wait for the standing ovation. But, in fact, it's bound to fail at the search, itself.

Microsoft seems to be missing the point of search. People use Google because it—on average—gets you the result you are looking for better and faster than Bing. It's that simple.

Search is not about delivering better more targeted ads to the reader. When looking for something to buy, I often ignore the paid ads, knowing I may find a better deal from the search results themselves. If I cannot do that, then I will switch search engines.

Meanwhile, Google is freaked and is determined to circumvent the sketchy Microsoft-Facebook cabal. It hopes to concentrate new efforts on location and local services to augment mobile phone searching.

I already know my neighborhood, so local search is only useful for exploring a new area. When in San Francisco, I used local search mechanisms, and they do not work well, to say the least. They suffer from the problem of clutter—arrows slammed on top of each other and messed up maps with too much junk.

This all reflect the biggest problem with search today: clutter—especially clutter within popular search categories. Repetitive and duplicative commercial sites selling cell phone plans, ink and cameras appear too often. Bogus SEO-centric sites appear high in search results, obscuring the relevant sites. The clutter problem should be the highest priority of search engines, not social and local search, which will only make the clutter worse.

Google and Microsoft both talk a big game, but like most users, my overall disappointment with search results increases every year. These companies need to realize that search is about three things: results, results, and results. Focus on that.


Popular posts from this blog

Epson Stylus NX625 Reviews

The Epson Stylus NX625 continues the tradition of Epson's NX line's tradition as a modestly priced multifunction printer geared mostly to home use. It has some big shoes to fill, as the model it's replacing—the Epson Stylus NX515—is an Editors' Choice. Although the NX625's text quality doesn't match the NX515's, the new model is even faster (and more well-rounded) than its notoriously speedy predecessor, making it the new Editors' Choice for a home MFP in its price range.

The NX625 measures 6.7 by 22.2 by 17 inches (HWD) and weighs 13.7 pounds. A 2.5-inch color LCD anchors its tilt-up front panel. It has a 150-sheet internal paper tray and an automatic duplexer for printing on both sides of a sheet of paper. Both should add to its home-office cred. (The NX515 only offered a 100-sheet paper tray, and lacked the auto-duplexer.) The new model does lose a port for printing from PictBridge-enabled cameras or USB thumb drives, though it has slots that support …

Latest Trends Xbox 360 (250GB)

Microsoft was the first to enter this current console-gaming generation with its original Xbox 360, a hulk of a system that beat both Nintendo and Sony to the punch. Despite the millions of Xboxes sold (or possibly because of it), the 360 line—encompassing the Xbox 360 Core, Xbox 360 Elite, Xbox 360 Pro, and Xbox 360 Arcade has been plagued by the infamous red ring of death, a fatal design flaw that caused some overheated Xbox 360 units to shut down and become inoperable. It also lacked built-in Wi-Fi (a feature that Sony's competing PlayStation 3 has included since it's launch), and the hard drive, which protruded slightly from the system, gave it an even bulkier appearance. Microsoft aims to remedy all of these ills with its latest $299.99 (list) Xbox 360 (250GB). Dubbed the "Xbox 360 slim" by both journalists and consumers, the redesigned Xbox 360 has the same horsepower, game library, and rich online experience as previous Xbox 360 models, but contains several ke…

HP Envy 14-1110NR Reviews

When I think of high-end mainstream laptops, brands like Apple's MacBook Pro, Dell's XPS, and Asus's U-Series are usually what come to mind. Another rising star in this category is the HP Envy 14-1110NR ($1,050 list), found at Staples. As its name suggests, it's the 14-inch version of HP's Envy line, lavished with features such as a glass-covered screen, a backlit keyboard, and some of the fastest components available. There are some lingering issues with the gesture touchpad, and the system is a little on the heavy side. Otherwise, the Envy 14-1110NR is a viable mainstream laptop for sophisticated users.

Anodized aluminum is the recurring theme in HP laptops. The Envy 14 is covered in it, whereas laptops like the Asus U45Jc-A1 ($867 street, 4.5 stars) and HP Pavilion dm4-1160us ($849.98 list, 4 stars) only use it on the cover and palm rest area. The design concept is similar to the Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch (Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz) ($1,199 direct, 4 stars), in th…